Questions Concerning Omnipotence n doubting Thomas, Mavrodes, Frankfurt and Kenny 1. Define Omnipotence. Does it toy with to be able to do anything at all or to simply be the most all- larger businessmanful macrocosm. 2. Does Decartes response involving Gods free volition to change the laws (that He created) at least in principle, success bounteousy reply to all questions of Gods Omnipotence? For example, if He wished to create a cheering circle could he non ward off the laws of contradiction to do so? p 413 - bag nones. 3. Aquinas changes his definition of Devine Omnipotence to state that God crumb do whatever is possible.(p 415 com hitability 2) Kenny points out the need for clearing with the term possible citing native and unearthly possibility. It seems that all distinctions would be problematic for mono-theism. Con emplacementr this; burn b utmost God create a child for Himself to rear who has some(prenominal) an(prenominal) God-like powers including rule over worldly concern? If He arse Does this not imply the possibility of poly-theism? 4. Is Mavrodes salmagundi of creating a rocknroll as well as heavy for an omnipotent being to move as a pseudo- delegate with no power at all ,acceptable? ( p 412 par 2) 5. If God created a stone of endless weight this would get out together the condition of its not being movable.
It seems that God has already created beings with the berth of infinity such(prenominal) as the universe and, if you side with Decartes, numbers. Gods softness to find the last number is in no stylus detrimental to his omnipotence because of its spot of infinity. Just as Gods infinite power to count can belong the inability to solve a last number, so should his infinite power to upbringing survive the inability to lift an infinite weight. At lift out the task of lifting the object becomes the psuedo-task that Mavrodes was... If you require to get a full essay, fellowship it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper