Wednesday, March 6, 2019
Analysis of Ã¢â¬ÅThe Trouble with FriesÃ¢â¬Â Essay
Malcolm Gladwells article The Trouble with Fries is approximately a very invasive topic. Fast Food is killing us. Can it be fixed? Although his thesis statement isnt exactly clear, he effectively uses demo to convince his audience that a feeding movement is requisite especially for fast aliment. By discussing some(prenominal) factors with supporting record that is unfeigned he shows why fast viands is struggling to have a maintenance movement. Malcolm Gladwell uses some very shocking facts approximately French hot up and how unhealthy they are for the body. He states the average American eats about thirty pounds of French fries a year.In 1990, health concerns arose about using animal-based cooking oil to recently fry them. This cause major fast- fodder houses to have to deep frying in vegetable oil. Gladwell then proves this change to be even un healthier. Switching to vegetable oil means going from saturate eke out to trans-fat, this makes the bodys ability to regul ate cholesterol uncontrollable. veggie oil becomes a trans-fat because it has to go through hydrogenation to become suitable for deep frying. According to a study Gladwell uses, for every 5% maturation in the amount of saturated fats that a woman consumes, her risk of heart affection increases by 17%.But only a 2% increase in trans-fat will increase her heart disease risk by 93%. This study was designed by Walter Willett who also states that the consumption of trans-fat in the United States probably causes about 30,000 premature deaths each year. This evidence used by Gladwell is very persuasive in the matter that an actual food movement is needed. Gladwell discusses an alternative healthier panache to deep fry French fries which shows great strength in his argument. The much healthier way of deep-frying French fries is by using Olestra, Malcolm Gladwell discusses.Olestra is a fat relievo that cannot be absorbed by the body. Frito-Lays no-fat Wow chips are do with a version o f Olestra. The FDA wont approved the alternate healthier way of deep-frying French fries by using Olestra because they claim it causes gastrointestinal distress. Proctor and Gamble, the developers of Olestra, performed a test and found that battalion eating classifiable amounts of Olestra-based chips dont have significantly more gastrointestinal problems than people eating normal chips. The FDA is now reviewing this finding. Gladwell used this to point out that its entirelypossible, right now, to make a French fry without many dangerous health concerns. The very strong point of this article is that Malcolm Gladwell not only uses French fries in his argument, but beef as well, to prove that it is not only the FDA holding back a nutrition movement. Gladwell uses evidence found by Auburn University. The Auburn Team created what they called the AU magnetic inclination beef. This was a beef patty that was ? water, 20% protein, 5% fat and, ? seaweed. They did a blind taste test compari son of AU heel burgers and traditional McDonalds burgers. The AU Lean burgers won overall.AU Lean also won in a test of 100 families severe AU Lean, market beef, and 5% fat beef. What this showed was that people can be fooled into thinking theyre eating a lot of fat when they rightfully arent. Shortly after, McDonalds came out with the McLean Deluxe, using AU Lean beef. It was interchange as the healthy choice, therefore people were informed it was healthy and it went discharge the market. This was great evidence Gladwell used that proved Americans think healthier food wont taste as well. There was also evidence that children also think the same way as the McDonalds usage of healthier food wont taste as good.Gladwell discusses an look into by Leann Birch on childrens aspects of food based on restriction. The experiment consisted of a large group of children feeding them a immense lunch then letting them loose in a get on with lots of junk food. Her findings were some childr en ate none of the junk food while others sincerely chowed down. This showed that the ones who chowed down are restricted from high-fat, high-sugar food so they think in terms of presence and absence of food or else than their hunger. Because they had been told junk food was bad for them, they thought that it had to taste good.This example really set the light for Gladwells argument. Its not the fact that the food is unhealthy but because of it. Malcolm Gladwell effectively convinced his audience that a nutrition movement is needed. He proves that not only the FDA is holding back an actual nutrition movement but the consumers as well. He supports this by the studies of evidence he provided stating there are healthier ways to fast food. whole works Cited Gladwell, Malcolm. The Trouble with Fries. The New Yorker 5 Mar. 2001. Web. 20 Feb. 2013.